Skip to the content
Liberty Politics
← California on November 3

California 31st District

Gil Cisneros (D) holds this seat and is running again. 2 candidates were on the ballot on November 3, 2026.

Who should win this race, and why?Say what you think. Other readers can answer you.Discuss
  • Gil Cisneros

    Democrat · holds this seat today

    F
    Liberty Score F

    On the liberty side in 15 of 44 votes and bills.

    Raised $853,124 since January 2025: 65% from PACs and other committees, 33% from people, 1% the candidate’s own money. The filing at FEC.gov

  • Eric Ching

    Republican · former walnut mayor and city council member, business owner

    No grade
    No grade yet

    I have no votes in Congress to count for Ching, and what Ching has said and done settles only 1 of my principles. I went through it on October 18. A grade needs 4.

    Raised $97,170 since January 2025: 100% from people. The filing at FEC.gov

Voting in California: how to register, vote early or vote by mail. Election Day was November 3.

Side by side

A solid letter is a grade from recorded votes on that principle. An outlined letter is on the same scale, for a candidate with no votes: it comes from what that candidate has said and done, and every source is listed below.

Confronts tyranny and terror
F
Cisneros2 of 9 votes with liberty
–
ChingNothing on record
Stands with free nations and free peoples
A-
Cisneros10 of 11 votes with liberty
?
ChingNot clear either way, from 1 source
Free speech and a free mind
–
CisnerosNo vote on this
?
ChingNot clear either way, from 1 source
Free markets and free trade
F
Cisneros1 of 7 votes with liberty
?
ChingNot clear either way, from 1 source
One law, equal for every individual
F
Cisneros0 of 4 votes with liberty
–
ChingNothing on record
Strong enough to stay free
–
Cisneros1 of 1, too few to grade
–
ChingNothing on record
Citizenship and the rule of law
F
Cisneros1 of 12 votes with liberty
A
ChingWith liberty, from 1 source

Eric Ching, on the record

I have no votes in Congress to count for Ching, so the grade above comes from this list: what Ching has said and done on my principles. Each line has its source, and each is marked with the same test I use for votes.

  • October 5, 2026 · InterviewFree nations

    Asked how to balance support for allies with the cost of forever wars, he said allies should be supported based on national interests.

    “We should support foreign allies based on our national interests.”
    By the test I use for votes
    Not clear either way

    Support for allies in general with no word on Ukraine, Taiwan or NATO does not settle the free nations test.

  • October 5, 2026 · InterviewFree speech

    Asked about AI in political ads, he said he does not oppose it if it is truthful but wants consequences for false information, naming no penalty.

    “I do not oppose the use of AI-generated political content as long as it is based on truth and facts. I believe there should be repercussions for false information.”
    By the test I use for votes
    Not clear either way

    Unnamed consequences for false political ads neither back nor reject a speech law, so the line does not settle the free_speech measure.

  • October 5, 2026 · InterviewFree markets

    He blamed high California taxes, permit processes and environmental laws for housing costs, without naming a federal tax or rule to cut.

    “California has some of the highest costs on gas, taxes, and overburdened permit processes and environmental laws.”
    By the test I use for votes
    Not clear either way

    A complaint about state costs with no tax or regulation named for cutting does not settle the free markets test.

  • October 5, 2026 · InterviewBorders

    In a newspaper questionnaire he said immigration policy should eliminate all illegal immigration while staying open to more legal immigration.

    “It should eliminate all illegal immigration while being open to more legal immigration.”
    By the test I use for votes
    With liberty

    Ending illegal entry is with liberty on borders.

Who is on the ballot: the state election offices, as listed on Wikipedia on November 3, 2026, checked against the candidate file of the Federal Election Commission. See a name that is wrong or missing? Say so in the discussion.

Who should win this race, and why?

Say it where other readers can answer you. Opinions, videos and corrections about this race are all in one place.

← The race

Discussion

California 31st District

All discussions, from every page →

Opinions, videos, corrections and bug reports about this race, all in one place. What readers post is their words, not mine. My answers carry the Host tag.

What kind of post is it?

Posting takes a free account. What you wrote is kept while you make one.

Leave out anything private about anyone. The rules, what your account keeps, and what readers have changed so far

Know this race better than I do?

Argue it with the hosts on a call. The community meets every day, and members help decide what goes on these pages.

Live on YouTube5 live shows a day, from 11am U.S. Eastern