Skip to the content
Liberty Politics
← Every vote

NO BAN Act

Bill sponsorship · S. 398Borders

Senate version of the NO BAN Act.

Liberty position
Stay off
Introduced
February 4, 2025
Why staying off is the liberty side
The Senate has never voted on this bill, so cosponsorship is the only signal.

Counted under the principle Citizenship and the rule of law.

The bill on Congress.gov
Did I call this bill right?Say what you think. Other readers can answer you.Discuss

The count

37 current members of Congress signed on, as sponsor or cosponsor. Members who have left Congress are not listed.

Signed on, against the liberty side
37
35 Democrats, 2 Independents
Did not sign, the liberty side
Not counted

Signed on

37 current members put their name on this bill. Signing on is against the liberty side.

Did not sign

Staying off this bill is the liberty side. It is not counted as a point for anyone, so the members who did not sign are not listed.

Every vote I countHow the score works

Did I call this bill right?

Say it where other readers can answer you. Opinions, videos and corrections about this bill are all in one place.

Open the discussion
← The bill

Discussion

NO BAN Act

All discussions, from every page →

I say the liberty side was to stay off. Agree, or not? Readers argue it here, in their own words. Not mine, and not checked the way a vote is.

What kind of post is it?

Posting takes a free account. What you wrote is kept while you make one.

What you post here can be shown, quoted and shared on the site and on the shows. The terms

Leave out anything private about anyone. The rules, what your account keeps, and what readers have changed so far

Would you score it differently?

Tell the hosts which vote, and why, on a call. The community meets every day.

Join the daily call
Live on YouTube5 live shows a day, from 11am U.S. Eastern