No War Against Iran Act
Bars federal money from being used for military force against the Islamic Republic unless Congress authorizes it.
- Liberty position
- Stay off
- Introduced
- June 17, 2025
- Why staying off is the liberty side
- It would take military action against the regime off the table.
Counted under the principle Confronts tyranny and terror.
The count
8 current members of Congress signed on, as sponsor or cosponsor. Members who have left Congress are not listed.
- Signed on, against the liberty side
- 8
- 7 Democrats, 1 Independent
- Did not sign, the liberty side
- Not counted
Signed on
8 current members put their name on this bill. Signing on is against the liberty side.
Tammy BaldwinD · Wisconsin · SenateF
Edward J. MarkeyD · Massachusetts · SenateF
Jeff MerkleyD · Oregon · SenateF
Bernard SandersI · Vermont · Senate · SponsorF
Tina SmithD · Minnesota · SenateF
Chris Van HollenD · Maryland · SenateF
Elizabeth WarrenD · Massachusetts · SenateF
Peter WelchD · Vermont · SenateF
Did not sign
Staying off this bill is the liberty side. It is not counted as a point for anyone, so the members who did not sign are not listed.
Did I call this bill right?
Say it where other readers can answer you. Opinions, videos and corrections about this bill are all in one place.
Discussion
No War Against Iran Act
I say the liberty side was to stay off. Agree, or not? Readers argue it here, in their own words. Not mine, and not checked the way a vote is.
Leave out anything private about anyone. The rules, what your account keeps, and what readers have changed so far
Would you score it differently?
Tell the hosts which vote, and why, on a call. The community meets every day.