Skip to the content

Liberty Politics

NO BAN Act

Bill sponsorship · H.R. 924Borders

Would limit the president's power to suspend entry of foreign nationals and bar religion-based entry restrictions, aimed at the travel bans on Muslim-majority countries.

Liberty position: Stay off
Introduced: February 4, 2025
Why staying off is the liberty side: Same bill as the 2021 House vote. Cosponsoring it means taking away the power to pause entry from countries that cannot vet their travellers.

Counted under the principle Citizenship and the rule of law.

The bill on Congress.gov

Did I call this bill right?Say what you think. Other readers can answer you.Discuss

The count

119 current members of Congress signed on, as sponsor or cosponsor. Members who have left Congress are not listed.

Signed on, against the liberty side: 119; 119 Democrats
Did not sign, the liberty side: Not counted

Signed on

119 current members put their name on this bill. Signing on is against the liberty side.

Did not sign

Staying off this bill is the liberty side. It is not counted as a point for anyone, so the members who did not sign are not listed.

Every vote I count How the score works

Did I call this bill right?

Say it where other readers can answer you. Opinions, videos and corrections about this bill are all in one place.

Open the discussion

Discussion

NO BAN Act

All discussions, from every page →

I say the liberty side was to stay off. Agree, or not? Readers argue it here, in their own words. Not mine, and not checked the way a vote is.

Leave out anything private about anyone. The rules, what your account keeps, and what readers have changed so far

Would you score it differently?

Tell the hosts which vote, and why, on a call. The community meets every day.

Join the daily call

Live on YouTube5 live shows a day, from 11am U.S. Eastern