Skip to the content

Liberty Politics

Requiring temporary protected status for Haiti (H.R. 1689)

House vote · H.R. 1689 · On Passage · April 16, 2026Borders

Would force DHS to give Haitians in the US temporary protected status through January 2029. It reached the floor by discharge petition.

Liberty position: Nay
The House voted: 224 Yea, 204 Nay
Why Nay is the liberty side: Voting no opposes extending a blanket stay for several hundred thousand people whose status the administration had ended.

Counted under the principle Citizenship and the rule of law.

The bill on Congress.gov The official roll call

Did I call this vote right?Say what you think. Other readers can answer you.Discuss

The count

429 current members of Congress were in the House for this vote. Members who have left Congress are not listed.

On the liberty side: 204; 204 Republicans
Against the liberty side: 222; 10 Republicans, 211 Democrats, 1 Independent
Not counted: 3; 3 Republicans

On the liberty side

204 current members voted Nay.

Against the liberty side

222 current members voted Yea.

Not counted

3 current members missed the vote or voted present. Neither counts for or against a member.

Every vote I count How the score works

Did I call this vote right?

Say it where other readers can answer you. Opinions, videos and corrections about this vote are all in one place.

Open the discussion

Discussion

Requiring temporary protected status for Haiti (H.R. 1689)

All discussions, from every page →

I say Nay was the liberty side. Agree, or not? Readers argue it here, in their own words. Not mine, and not checked the way a vote is.

Leave out anything private about anyone. The rules, what your account keeps, and what readers have changed so far

Would you score it differently?

Tell the hosts which vote, and why, on a call. The community meets every day.

Join the daily call

Live on YouTube5 live shows a day, from 11am U.S. Eastern