Skip to the content

Liberty Politics

Protecting Prudent Investment of Retirement Savings Act (H.R. 2988)

House vote · H.R. 2988 · On Passage · January 15, 2026Free markets

Requires managers of employer retirement plans to choose investments on financial return only, limiting the use of environmental, social and governance factors.

Liberty position: Yea
The House voted: 213 Yea, 205 Nay
Why Yea is the liberty side: A yes vote opposed ESG investing with workers' retirement savings.

Counted under the principle Free markets and free trade.

The bill on Congress.gov The official roll call

Did I call this vote right?Say what you think. Other readers can answer you.Discuss

The count

427 current members of Congress were in the House for this vote. Members who have left Congress are not listed.

On the liberty side: 212; 208 Republicans, 3 Democrats, 1 Independent
Against the liberty side: 203; 203 Democrats
Not counted: 12; 8 Republicans, 4 Democrats

On the liberty side

212 current members voted Yea.

Against the liberty side

203 current members voted Nay.

Not counted

12 current members missed the vote or voted present. Neither counts for or against a member.

Every vote I count How the score works

Did I call this vote right?

Say it where other readers can answer you. Opinions, videos and corrections about this vote are all in one place.

Open the discussion

Discussion

Protecting Prudent Investment of Retirement Savings Act (H.R. 2988)

All discussions, from every page →

I say Yea was the liberty side. Agree, or not? Readers argue it here, in their own words. Not mine, and not checked the way a vote is.

Leave out anything private about anyone. The rules, what your account keeps, and what readers have changed so far

Would you score it differently?

Tell the hosts which vote, and why, on a call. The community meets every day.

Join the daily call

Live on YouTube5 live shows a day, from 11am U.S. Eastern