Skip to the content

Liberty Politics

No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act

House vote · H.R. 5717 · On Passage · September 20, 2024Borders

Would cut off federal funds that sanctuary jurisdictions use to provide food, shelter, health care and other services to illegal immigrants.

Liberty position: Yea
The House voted: 219 Yea, 186 Nay
Why Yea is the liberty side: It penalizes cities that refuse to cooperate with immigration enforcement.

Counted under the principle Citizenship and the rule of law.

The bill on Congress.gov The official roll call

Did I call this vote right?Say what you think. Other readers can answer you.Discuss

The count

365 current members of Congress were in the House for this vote. Members who have left Congress are not listed.

On the liberty side: 184; 175 Republicans, 8 Democrats, 1 Independent
Against the liberty side: 162; 162 Democrats
Not counted: 19; 9 Republicans, 10 Democrats

On the liberty side

184 current members voted Yea.

Against the liberty side

162 current members voted Nay.

Not counted

19 current members missed the vote or voted present. Neither counts for or against a member.

Every vote I count How the score works

Did I call this vote right?

Say it where other readers can answer you. Opinions, videos and corrections about this vote are all in one place.

Open the discussion

Discussion

No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act

All discussions, from every page →

I say Yea was the liberty side. Agree, or not? Readers argue it here, in their own words. Not mine, and not checked the way a vote is.

Leave out anything private about anyone. The rules, what your account keeps, and what readers have changed so far

Would you score it differently?

Tell the hosts which vote, and why, on a call. The community meets every day.

Join the daily call

Live on YouTube5 live shows a day, from 11am U.S. Eastern